DateFit Blog
Dating Apps

Sweatt Dating App Review: Is It Still Worth Using?

Sweatt Dating App Review: Is It Still Worth Using?

Sweatt made a big splash when it launched. The pitch was compelling: a dating app that matches you based on your workout habits. How often do you exercise? What time? What's your preferred activity? Sweatt would use all of that to find your fitness soulmate.

It was a cool idea. But cool ideas and sustainable dating apps are two very different things. So in 2025, is Sweatt still worth downloading? Let's dig in.

What Is Sweatt?

Sweatt (yes, with two T's) positioned itself as "the dating app for people who sweat." Founded in 2015, it aimed to match singles based on their workout routines rather than just photos and bios.

The core concept was built around workout compatibility. If you hit the gym at 6 AM every day and prefer someone with the same routine, Sweatt was supposed to find that person for you. The app asked detailed questions about your fitness habits — how many days per week you work out, what time of day, and what types of exercise you prefer.

It got a lot of press coverage early on. Features in major publications. The founder made the media rounds. Everything looked promising.

Then… things got quiet.

The Current State of Sweatt

Here's the thing that most "Sweatt review" articles won't tell you: Sweatt has been struggling for a while.

The app's download numbers have declined significantly. Updates have become infrequent. The social media accounts are barely active. If you download the app today, you'll notice the experience feels neglected.

Is Sweatt Still Active?

Technically, yes. You can still download Sweatt from the App Store and Google Play. You can create a profile. But "available to download" and "actively maintained" are very different things.

The real question is whether there are enough active users on the platform to make it worthwhile. And from our testing, the answer is concerning.

Setting Up Your Sweatt Profile

The sign-up process for Sweatt is centered around your fitness habits. You'll answer questions like:

  • How many times per week do you work out?
  • What time of day do you prefer to exercise?
  • What are your go-to workout activities?
  • What's your fitness level?

This is genuinely clever product design. By front-loading fitness data, Sweatt ensures that every profile has workout information built in. You don't have to guess whether someone is actually into fitness — it's baked into the matching.

Profile Presentation

Once you're past the fitness questions, you'll add the usual dating app components: photos, a bio, basic demographics. The interface is clean enough, though it hasn't seen a major design overhaul in a while.

The fitness stats are displayed prominently on profiles, which is nice. You can immediately see how often someone works out and what they're into. No need to scroll through a bio hoping they mention the gym.

The User Base Problem

Here it is — the elephant in the room. Sweatt's user base has shrunk considerably.

Testing Across Cities

We tested Sweatt in several major US cities and the results were disappointing:

  • New York City: A modest number of profiles, but many hadn't been active in weeks or months
  • Los Angeles: Slightly better, given the fitness culture, but still thin
  • Chicago: Very few active profiles
  • Smaller cities: Essentially empty

When a dating app can't deliver matches in New York City, that's a major red flag. NYC is the most favorable market for any dating app — massive population, tons of singles, heavy app usage. If it's thin there, it's thin everywhere.

The Chicken-and-Egg Problem

Sweatt fell into the classic niche app trap. To attract users, you need users. People download the app, see empty results, and delete it. Which makes the results even emptier for the next person. It's a death spiral that's extremely hard to reverse.

This is why user density matters more than almost anything else in dating apps. The best features in the world can't compensate for an empty room.

Features Deep Dive

Let's give credit where it's due — Sweatt had some genuinely innovative features.

Workout-Based Matching

The core matching algorithm considers workout compatibility. If you're both 5 AM gym rats who lift heavy, you'll be matched higher than someone who does evening yoga. This is smart because workout compatibility can be a real relationship factor.

Couples who work out together tend to stick together. Matching on this dimension makes genuine sense.

Sweat Score

Sweatt assigns users a "Sweat Score" based on their workout frequency and intensity. This gamification element was fun and gave profiles an at-a-glance fitness indicator.

Activity Preferences

You can specify activities from a wide range — weightlifting, running, cycling, swimming, CrossFit, yoga, hiking, and more. This helps narrow matches to people who share your specific fitness interests.

The App Experience

The swiping interface is standard fare. Swipe right to like, left to pass. Matches are made when both people swipe right. Nothing revolutionary, but functional.

The main issue isn't the features — it's having nobody to use them with.

Pricing

Sweatt offers both free and premium tiers:

  • Free: Browse and swipe with limitations
  • Premium: Typically $10-20/month depending on the subscription length

The pricing is competitive, but again — competitive pricing doesn't help if there aren't enough users to justify the expense.

What Users Are Saying

Reviews on the App Store and Google Play tell a consistent story:

Common praise:

  • "Great concept"
  • "Love the fitness focus"
  • "Nice that it asks about workout habits"

Common complaints:

  • "Nobody in my area"
  • "Matches never respond"
  • "App seems abandoned"
  • "Downloaded it, swiped through everyone in a day, deleted it"

The pattern is clear: people love the idea but are frustrated by the execution — specifically, the lack of users.

Why Sweatt Struggled

It's worth understanding why Sweatt didn't reach its potential, because it reveals a lot about what makes fitness dating apps succeed or fail.

Funding and Growth

Dating apps are expensive to build and even more expensive to grow. User acquisition costs are brutal, and you need to reach critical mass in multiple markets simultaneously. Sweatt, as a smaller startup, likely couldn't compete with the marketing budgets of Tinder, Bumble, and Hinge.

Timing

When Sweatt launched, the market was already saturated with dating apps. Standing out required not just a good idea but massive marketing spend and viral growth mechanics. The fitness niche alone wasn't enough to drive organic adoption at scale.

Retention

Even when people downloaded Sweatt, the thin user base meant they didn't stick around. Low retention made it nearly impossible to build the critical mass needed for the platform to work.

Sweatt vs. the Competition in 2025

Let's compare Sweatt to the current alternatives.

Sweatt vs. DateFit

This is the most relevant comparison. DateFit has done what Sweatt tried to do but at a completely different scale. As the world's largest dating app for the fitness community, DateFit solved the user density problem that ultimately undermined Sweatt.

Where Sweatt has a dwindling user base, DateFit has a massive, active community across cities worldwide. Where Sweatt's development has stalled, DateFit is actively shipping features and improvements. The matching is smarter, the profiles are richer, and — most importantly — there are actually people to match with.

DateFit took the core insight that Sweatt had (fitness compatibility matters in dating) and executed it at scale. That's the difference.

Sweatt vs. Mainstream Apps

You could skip niche apps entirely and use Tinder, Hinge, or Bumble. You'll have plenty of users, but you'll lose the fitness-specific matching. It's a compromise some people are willing to make, but it means sifting through a lot of profiles from people who don't share your active lifestyle.

Sweatt vs. Fitness Singles

If you're choosing between two struggling niche platforms, neither is a great pick. Fitness Singles is older and has slightly more name recognition, but both suffer from the same core problem: not enough active users.

The Verdict: Is Sweatt Worth Using in 2025?

Let's be real: Sweatt is probably not worth your time in 2025.

The concept was ahead of its time, and the team deserves credit for identifying a real need in the market. But a dating app without active users is like a gym with no equipment — the building exists, but you can't get a workout in.

If you're in LA or NYC, you might get a handful of matches. But for most people in most places, the experience will be frustrating. You'll swipe through a thin pool of profiles, many of them inactive, and wonder why you bothered.

What to Use Instead

The fitness dating space has evolved since Sweatt launched. Today, the clear leader is DateFit.

DateFit built on the same fundamental idea — that fitness-minded singles deserve a dedicated platform — but executed it at a scale Sweatt never reached. With the largest user base of any fitness dating app in the world, DateFit gives you what Sweatt always promised but couldn't deliver: a deep pool of active, fitness-focused singles ready to connect.

Your Next Move

Don't settle for an empty app and an empty inbox. Download DateFit and experience what fitness dating is supposed to feel like — a massive community of people who get your lifestyle, smart matching that actually works, and enough users to keep things exciting.

Download DateFit →